A report by The High Level Panel of Experts on Food Security and Nutrition
June 2018, 144 pages
This report highlights transparency and accountability as key conditions: to align MSPs’ work with the progressive realization of the right to adequate food; to better use existing resources for FSN and sustainable development; and to potentially attract new resources.
This report also suggests a set of criteria to enable governments and non-state actors to perform their own assessments of MSPs following a common methodology.
27 June 2018. Launch of the HLPE report
27 June 2018. Launch of the HLPE report
- Introduction of the HLPE Report
Patrick Caron (see picture), HLPE Steering Committee Chair
For sure, MSPs should not be considered as a silver-bullet solution to any type of problem, as a panacea. Their emerging importance as part of a new approach to governance for food security and nutrition does not take place without controversy. Scientists are still debating on the exact definition of “stakeholders” vs. “actors” or “partnerships” vs. “platforms”. They question the potential benefits and limitations, the performance and even the relevance of MSPs as a suitable institutional mechanism to finance and improve food security and nutrition. - HLPE Report
- Main findings - Moraka Makhura, HLPE Project Team Leader
- Recommendations - Muhammad Azeem Khan, HLPE Convener for the study
- Opening statement from the Chair of CFS, H.E. Amb. Mario Arvelo
- Opening statement from the Chair of the HLPE, Dr Patrick Caron
- Slides of the presentation of the report, by the Project Team Leader Dr Moraka Makhura and Oversight Convener for the study Dr Muhammad Azeem Khan
- Closing statement from the Chair of CFS, H.E. Amb. Mario Arvelo
No comments:
Post a Comment